BRUNSWICK — A group of seven Brunswick residents are asking the town not to add solar panels to their property assessments.

The group, represented by Brian Marshall of the law firm Verrill Dana, has filed an appeal of the assessor’s solar panel assessment with Brunswick’s Board of Assessment Review.

Jake Plante of Rossmore Road, one of the seven, estimated there are about 130 homes with solar in town. He said there is a lack of evidence to show there is a real connection between solar panel income and resale value of a property.

“All things aren’t being treated equally,” Plante said. “There are a lot of other fuel types and energy-saving measures people take to reduce their energy footprint and they’re not taxed for those things. So solar is being singled out for this tax.”

Town Assessor Cathleen Jamison rebutted that, saying other energy-efficient components are included in the construction details of a home.

“So if you have a home that has upgraded windows and newer systems, then it’s going to have a different assessed value than one that does not,” she said. “Some of the items like generators and in this case solar panels, get priced out separately from the home.

“They’re not part of the grading process of the home or the depreciation process of the home,” Jamison added, “and they get assessed separately to the home.”

Jamison said she read articles stating that value is attributable to solar panels for the resale of the home, “so based on that information, we assess them.”

During the recent revaluation process, solar panels were counted and assessed at $500 each. After some solar panel owners sought abatements, the per-panel-assessment was lowered to $200 apiece, an amount given to all property owners with solar installations. For the seven property owners Marshall is representing, abatements ranged from $82 to $174.

In letters to Marshall’s clients, Jamison acknowledged there are no sales comparisons on which to base the assessments, but they are instead based on income they generate, something opponents say is problematic.

Marshall said the assessment is unlawful because it is arbitrary and fails to arrive at “just value” – or market value – for the systems, that the method is discriminatory because it singles out solar technology, and is contrary to state policy supporting solar energy development.

“What I think is so troubling to us is that just a couple years ago, the town sponsored the Solarize Brunswick program,” Plante said. “I think 65 sales resulted from that program, which was incredibly successful, with 45 roof-top systems and some 20-odd more that joined community solar farms around the state – all in response to the town sponsoring this event to reduce prices and buy collectively.”

Also taking up the cause is the Natural Resources Council of Maine, which sent a letter to the town Board of Assessment Review, noting its concern that taxing solar installations will discourage people from investing in the sustainable energy technology.

“The Maine Public Utilities Commission recently approved substantial changes to net billing rules that will result in lower compensation and a longer payback time for residential solar installations over their useful lives,” wrote Dylan Voorhees, the organization’s climate and clean energy director.

The NRCM is among parties that have appealed those rules changes to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, where the case is pending a final decision.

While some states provide exemptions for solar panels for assessment purposes, Maine is not one of them. To residents seeking abatements, Jamison has written she must assess property according to state law – not according to state policy.

If the solar systems are to be tax-exempt in Brunswick, she said Monday, “the Legislature needs to take that issue up and put it on the law books.”

The NRCM expects the Legislature to take up the issue of solar taxation in the next legislative session.

“Specifically, the Legislature may consider implementing a uniform state policy on residential solar taxation,” wrote Voorhees, “thereby preventing (a) patchwork of different solar valuation methodologies in towns across the state.”

In the meantime, Plante worries about the implications of the town taxing solar installations. He has 18 solar panels, which added about $8,000 in additional assessed value – taxed at a rate of about one-third to one-half of the income the system generates.

“What it means is not only will we not get back our investment very soon or maybe many years beyond when we thought we would,” said Plante, “but it means there won’t be any more solar building in Brunswick.”

No Brunswick Board of Assessment Review meeting has yet been scheduled to hear arguments about the solar assessment.

< Previous

Next >

Related Stories

North Carolina joined California, Arizona, Nevada and Texas in seeing the greatest total increases in solar energy generation from 2008 to 2017, according to a report released Tuesday by Environment North Carolina Policy and Research Center.

North Carolina ranks 3rd in solar energy growth.

“We’ve seen an 87,670 percent increase over the last decade in the amount of electricity we get from the sun,” said Drew Ball, director of Environment North Carolina Policy and Research Center. “Considering that 10 years ago wind and solar produced around one percent of our electricity nationally, these numbers are pretty amazing. Wind and solar now produce enough electricity to power 31 million homes.”

Ball and other enviromental and renewable energy advocates participated in a conference call to discuss the report.

Adam Forrer, Atlantic region manager for Southeastern Wind Coalition, noted that North Carolina is home to the largest utility-scale wind facility in the region, the Amazon Wind Farm U.S. East, in Perquimans and Pasquotank counties.

“That project represents $520,000 in annual tax revenue, $624,000 in annual landowner payments and during construction the developer, Avangrid, invested $18 million locally,” Forrer said.

But according to the new report, North Carolina ranks only 30th in wind energy growth.

A Republican-backed moratorium on wind farms in the state remains in place until December.

Jennifer Mundt, energy director with the state Department of Environmental Quality, said investing in renewable power sources has more than just economic benefits.

“In many regions of the country, wind and solar power generation are now cheaper than many fossil fuels,” she said during Tuesday’s conference call. “These cheaper costs do not even take into consideration or account the environmental benefits that are associated with the deployment of clean energy technology.”

North Carolina ranks 17th for the number of electric vehicles sold and 13th for improvements in electricity energy efficiency.

Alexandra Antonucci, Editorial Intern
Published 3:58 p.m. ET July 17, 2018

CLOSE

A Mountainside man is biking across the United States to raise money for cancer research.
~Courtesy of Nathaniel Butler

SOUTH BRUNSWICK – Republic Services and New Jersey Resources Clean Energy Venture (CEV) unveiled 40,000 solar panels in the township on Tuesday.

A ribbon-cutting ceremony marked the occasion, atop the site of the closed landfill at 175 New Road.

The panels are owned, operated and maintained by CEV, the renewable energy subsidiary of New Jersey Resources. The project took roughly five years and will promote green energy and reduce emissions, all while utilizing an open space. 

Attendees included Loan Mansey, Northeast area president of Republic Services; Mark Valori, vice president of New Jersey Resources CEV; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regional Administrator Walter Mugdan and South Brunswick Mayor Charles Carley;  

“It’s a great day for South Brunswick,” Carley said. “It’s a significant investment, and we’re happy that you made that investment in our town.”

The site was a landfill from 1959 to 1979. From 1982 to 1985, it underwent remediation to rid the area of any hazardous materials. Since then, the Superfund site’s 68 acres of land have remained unused.

There were various proposals through the years on how to use the property, but Mugdan believes that this option was one of “the very, very best things that you can do with a closed landfill.”

READ: South Brunswick man masturbated behind police headquarters, cops say

READ: Piscataway driver charged with vehicular homicide in South Plainfield motorcycle crash

READ: South Brunswick: ATM stolen from Raceway gas station; suspects sought

“That takes dedication, it takes focus and we’re really just delighted that you have done that,” Mugdan said, addressing the crowd. “EPA  very, very strongly supports the reuse of Superfund sites like this one. We think it’s an important part of the overall cleanup process.”

The $20 million project was built through unionized labor and funded by New Jersey Resources with no cost to taxpayers.

“The construction of this project put a lot of people to work, there will be a lot of people that continue to work here,” said Carley. “We’re putting a lot of energy back in the grid, clean energy. There won’t be a carbon footprint. There won’t be foreign energy, it’ll be ours.”

As Mansey stated, Republic Services is committed to the “residents and business of South Brunswick and the surrounding communities.

“As you look at the site today, you can see that we’ve made a significant investment to preserve the local community which we, at Republic Services, calls affectionately ‘our blue planet,'” he said. “For this generation and future generations to come.”

Read or Share this story: https://mycj.co/2zTRONc