[ad_1]

Governor Rauner has signed two bills that will help ensure solar development benefits farmers and rural communities in Illinois. The state’s solar industry worked with the Illinois Farm Bureau, local authorities and other stakeholders to shape SB 486, which creates a standard tax assessment value for solar farms in Illinois, and SB 2591, which sets standards for the construction and deconstruction of solar farms on agricultural land. The Illinois House and Senate passed both bills unanimously and Governor Rauner signed the final piece of legislation on August 10.

The solar property tax legislation (SB 486) sets a standard tax assessment value for large solar installations, creating certainty around the property tax revenue that solar farms will pay to local taxing bodies, helping to fund schools, roads and other critical services. Under the legislation, each megawatt of ground-mounted solar installed in Illinois will generate an average of $6,000 to $8,000 per year in property tax revenue. The industry expects to install up to 2,000 MW of ground-mounted solar farms by 2021, which will create a total $250-$350 million in property tax revenue over a 25-year lifespan. Under Illinois’ funding formula, approximately 70{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} of this revenue will be dedicated to funding schools.

“Solar energy is a rapidly growing industry in Illinois, and it’s good not only for the environment but also for the economy,” said Illinois Senator Don Harmon (D-Oak Park), sponsor of SB 486. “It is my hope that the revenue generated from this industry can benefit local schools and communities and encourage the continued growth of solar power in our state.”

“Solar businesses are ready and willing to create new jobs, clean energy and tax revenue to support Illinois communities. This bill provides a framework for us to move forward,” said Lesley McCain, executive director of the Illinois Solar Energy Association. “The solar industry was proud to work with the Farm Bureau, county tax assessors and school districts to develop smart solar legislation that benefits all Illinoisans.”

The solar industry worked in partnership with Environmental Law & Policy Center and other advocates to support smart solar policy in Illinois.

“ELPC has helped drive clean energy development in Illinois, and we are pleased that Governor Rauner has signed the solar energy legislation that the General Assembly passed this spring,” said Howard Learner, executive director of the Environmental Law & Policy Center. “The stage is set even better to accelerate solar energy development that is good for job creation and good for a cleaner energy future in Illinois.”

The farmland legislation (SB 2591) ensures that solar farms can coexist with agriculture in Illinois while providing long-term benefits to soil and water quality. SB 2591 requires that solar developers enter into an Agricultural Impact Mitigation Agreement (AIMA) with the Illinois Department of Agriculture prior to solar farm construction. The AIMA will set standards for solar construction and deconstruction and require financial assurances from developers that land will be restored to its prior use at the end of a solar farm’s life.

Governor Rauner signed SB 486 on August 10th and SB 2591 on June 29th. These bills will help Illinois reach its statewide goal of 25{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} renewable energy by 2025 while also driving economic development, new jobs and reducing pollution from electric generation.

News item from Illinois Solar Energy Association

[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

With the Governments Feed-In Tarif (FiT) scheme set to close in April 2019, The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has predicted that the total deployable MWs for sub-5MW installations is expected to drop below 50MW-100MW per year as a result.

Currently, the FiT scheme pays people for generating their own sustainable and clean energy from small-scale, low-carbon, installations while also providing extra payments for those who manage to create more than they use. In what could be considered a frustrating move for everyone in the industry, the uncertainty of what the closure of this scheme will mean has already resulted in an increasing number of investors avoiding solar altogether and looking for investments elsewhere.

The Cons

Loss of investment

The FiT scheme provided a great way of providing a solid ROI for those looking to deploy solar power as well as a way of bringing the overall costs down, and the removal of this could mean less incentive for people to invest in Solar.

Drop in solar power

The closure of this scheme could have a huge impact on the amount of renewable energy going into the grid as the loss of incentive and funding reduces the amount of people who invest in solar power.

Fall in investment

Investment in green energy fell 56{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} in the UK in 2017 after years of huge cuts and months of stop-start support from the government, and with the FiT scheme closing this could only drop further.

Loss of confidence

The removal of this scheme and the increasing number of hurdles put in the pathway of individuals trying to contribute to energy efficiency could deter individuals from installing solar panels due to the risk of constantly changing rules leaving them out of pocket and the potential risks of this is an issue that needs to be considered before change is made.

The Pros

New opportunities

With the accessibility of renewable energy sources on the rise, the closure of this scheme makes way for new and better funds and support to take its place.

Moving on

Chris Hewett, Chief Executive of the Solar Trade Association, said: “The solar industry responded to government support through Feed-in-Tariffs by installing solar PV on nearly a million buildings in the last decade. We are ready to move into the next phase as subsidies reduce but cannot develop viable business models until we know the rules under which we will be operating beyond spring 2019.”

Confidence waning

With FiT’s having supported the majority of small-scale low-carbon energy installed in the UK, it has been invaluable in contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gases, but with investor confidence waning, it could be argued that the closure of the FiT scheme could not be coming at a better time.

Market accessibility

On one hand, the closure of this scheme opens doors for new flexible markets and schemes to take its place. If successful, this would widen the market to make it more accessible and increase opportunities for more individuals to save themselves money while also contributing to the government’s efforts to become more energy efficient.

The Bottom Line

While the closure of the FiT Scheme could result in a capacity short fall as less people use solar power instead turning to coal and other non-renewable energies, the full benefits of the closure of this scheme are still unknown.

There are still a lot of issues to be resolved before this scheme is closed and the complexity of these issues means time is needed to resolve them. If you would like to know more about our products and solutions and how we can help you make an impact, please contact KiWi Power.

This is a promoted article. 



[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

California regulators relied on precarious assumptions and incomplete data to rationalize their decision to require every home in the state be fitted with solar panels.

The California Energy Commission made history when it voted in May to mandate every home carry solar panel installations. The rule — the first of its kind in the country — will apply to all newly built homes and low-rise apartment buildings beginning in January 2020, with some exceptions for shaded houses and people already involved in other renewable energy programs. (RELATED: California Will Force EVERY New Home Owner To Install Solar Panels)

The new mandate was the latest in California’s bid to be a leader in renewable energy development. Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, a major proponent of climate change legislation, has continually pushed for a higher renewable energy mix in the state while attempting to phase out coal generation.

Besides touting the environmental benefits that would come with such a mandate, the California Energy Commission argued that it would ultimately save residents money. However, one policy expert has dumped cold water on those claims.

Steven Sexton, an assistant professor of public policy and economics at Duke University, outlined where the Commission relied on biased analysis and made flimsy assumptions on what the future costs of solar technology would be — mistakes that don’t reveal the true costs of owning solar panel, according to him.

“Though the solar mandate is unlikely to deliver huge savings to consumers, it certainly will raise the price of new and old homes,” Sexton wrote in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal.

The Commission argued that homeowners would save money with solar panels. Instead of using an independent investigation, however, they relied on economic analysis from Energy and Environmental Economics Inc., a consultancy group that proposed the very mandate they were studying. Energy and Environmental Economics concluded that homeowners would pay $40 more in monthly mortgage costs but save $80 a month on electricity — a supposed 100 percent return on investment.

Adding further scrutiny to their energy savings estimations, regulators conducted the study with the assumption that that California’s net metering policy would remain the same. Net metering — a solar subsidy program that ultimately passes costs from panel owners to non-panel ratepayers — has been second guessed and reformed across the country. The California Public Utilities Commission is set to reconsider their net metering program in 2019, one year before the mandate is to go into effect. If regulators choose to scale back these subsidies, solar panel owners would likely lose money on such an investment.

Additionally, Sexton argued that the Commission was overly optimistic on the price of solar panel installation. They concluded that the cost was $2.93 a watt in 2016 and would drop 17 percent by 2020, but a study by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that the average cost of panels to be $4.50 a watt for the 2- to 4-kilowatt systems the new policy requires.

Sexton argued that if California regulators were truly interested in the development of solar-generated electricity, they would look toward the economies of scale that is found in large solar farms — projects which produce twice as much electricity as the new mandate placed on small residential homes, but at the same exact cost.

“Sacramento politicians accuse the Trump administration of ignoring science and forgoing expert, independent review in pursuing its environmental and energy agenda,” he wrote. “They should look in the mirror.”

Follow Jason on Twitter.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.



[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

Slate solar 3 in one roof

Black or blue silicone solar cells have average efficiency ratings of around 22 percent in test settings, often with a range of 15 to 17 percent in real-world conditions during a course of the day. The creators of the new 3 in 1 Roof system think they have a better solution, at least when it comes to mitigating efficiency loses caused by high temperatures.

The 3 in 1 Roof

3 IN 1 ROOF is designed for the roofer by a roofing contractor located in South Florida. After hurricane Wilma, the contractor completed several hundred roofing jobs where he analyzed why traditional tiles failed under such extreme weather conditions and corrected those flaws in his design of the 3 IN 1 ROOF product.

3 IN 1 ROOF install much, much faster than traditional tiles so roofers earn more annual profits without increasing personnel. 3 IN 1 ROOF will not break or crack under foot because its underside patented wedge shape design eliminates potential fractures when too much pressure is applied. Also every horizontal and vertical row installs perfectly straight without chalking lines.

How it reduces temperature

For every 20 degrees, the surface temperature of a traditional roof rises above 120 degrees, the solar functionality decreases by 5 percent. Therefore when common roof products are at their hottest, a solar panel’s efficiency is at its lowest. Plus, asphalt, concrete and metal takes many hours to heat up, and the same amount of time to cool down or even longer if the attic is poorly ventilated.

RELATED: Silicon heterojunction solar cell technology moves beyond the lab

The secret sauce of the 3 in 1 Roof system is two amalgamates. The 3 IN 1 ROOF embodiment is comprised of heat-resistant closed cell foam, and it’s coated with a durable Geopolymer that increases in temperature only about 12 degrees above ambient. As the ambient rises and falls, so does the surface temperature of the 3 in 1 Roof and at near simultaneous frequencies. Therefore, unless summer temperatures exceed over 110 degrees Fahrenheit, the 3 in 1 Roof system’s solar module will always yield maximum efficiency.

Through in-house testing, the company shows that the 3 in 1 Roof system is “as efficient” as solar panels between the morning and afternoon hours. But after 3 p.m., the difference in performance is dramatic. On an 88 to 90 degree day, test data reveals beyond mid-afternoon about 23{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} more energy is generated by the 3 IN 1 ROOF, because traditional roofing has collected and amassed so much heat from the sun, it reaches surface temperatures well over 150 degrees. When one takes into account around 4-5 hours of advanced power creation, it mathematically boosts the 3 IN 1 ROOF system’s over all efficiency rating to 17 to 19 percent.

3 in 1 Roof features a highly UV resistant topcoat that keeps its surface temperature slightly above ambient temperatures. Also our durable foam embodiment prevents heat transference prolonging substrate life expectancy by approximately 300{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974}, while it keeps attics cool saving up to 38{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} on BTU consumption. That means reduced monthly kilowatt needs lending lower fuel bills and most important, a lesser amount of solar cells needed to power the house, allowing consumers to reduce before they produce

In addition, its SPF-like foam character blocks all solar gains from entering into the attic area, lending day-long cool substrates, decking and garrets, virtually eliminating heat flowback.

What is heat flowback and why eliminate it?

Solar gains into an attic causes all sorts of humidity issues fundamentally negative to any structure, including but not limited to; dry-rot, condensation, mold and everything that’s related to moisture plus heat. Flowback is when attics get so hot, they’re virtually structural incubators. Hot air prevents the wood decking it contacts from cooling down while the traditional roofing cools over night, thus prolonging the roof’s ability to equalize ambient temperature.

All these dilemmas are not only problematic with traditional roofing systems, they’re also drawbacks for each and every integrated solar tile and integrated solar shingles system, but not for the 3 in 1.

[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

Wells Fargo announced it has committed the capital in construction debt, as well as the tax-equity funding of $35 million for the new solar generation facility, known as FL Solar 5 in Orange County, Florida. This solar facility will include half a million solar panels and will also reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 57,000 tons per year. That’s the annual equivalent of removing 9,300 automobiles from the roads.

Origis Energy USA, a Miami-based solar energy company that delivers custom clean energy solutions for utility, commercial, and public-sector clients, developed the solar project and is providing the balance of the project’s capital as well as acting as the solar power plant’s engineering, procurement and construction provider.

“We are pleased to partner with Wells Fargo on this significant renewable energy project,” said Samir Verstyn, chief investment officer of Origis Energy USA. “Our team is focused on delivering superior customer service with sustainable energy solutions such as this one.”

Scheduled to be fully operational in December 2018, FL Solar 5 will produce and transmit low-cost, renewable electricity to be purchased by Reedy Creek Improvement District of Orange County, Florida.

“Wells Fargo is proud to be a part of impactful projects like FL Solar 5 that help our communities accelerate the transition to a lower carbon economy,” said Alok Garg of Wells Fargo Independent Power & Infrastructure group, a part of the Wells Fargo Energy Group. “We value our relationship with Origis Energy, a company that is in the forefront of creating a greener energy future.”

For the past 13 years, Wells Fargo has been a significant contributor to the advancement of clean energy in the U.S., with financing and tax equity investments energizing U.S. wind and solar. The bank has funded or committed to fund more than $6 billion in wind and solar projects throughout the U.S. Since 2012, Wells Fargo has invested and financed more than $70 billion in renewable energy, clean technology, “greener” buildings, sustainable agriculture and other environmentally sustainable businesses. In addition, Wells Fargo recently pledged to provide $200 billion in financing to sustainable businesses and projects by 2030, with more than 50{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} focused on clean technology and renewable energy transactions that directly support the transition to a low-carbon economy.

News item from Wells Fargo

[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

About This Item

  • 1.Wireless, Stainless, IP 65 Waterproof
  • 4.Easy to be installed in-ground
  • 3.Light sensor for automatic working
  • 2.Durable Design, Great for Front Path, Driveway, Garden, Yard
  • 3.Solar Energy— Efficient solar panel with built-in 600 mah rechargeable ba

Questions & Answers0 question

Get specific details about this product from customers who own it.

Policies & Plans

See any care plans, options and policies that may be associated with this product.

Electrode, Comp-329026515, DC-prod-dal2, ENV-prod-p, PROF-PROD, VER-24.12.4, SHA-fe5eabd678e73ffedf22f999efa2080c42d5639a, CID-

[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

The city of Wasco, Calif., is building a solar project on the site of a former burn dump; the renewable energy produced will help offset about 60{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} of the city’s current energy usage and costs from its municipal buildings, as well as from the treatment and distribution of water and wastewater. The city expects to save $8.6 million in energy costs over the next 15 years.

The former burn dump site, which was capped and remediated in the 1970s, has limited use but is an ideal location for a sizable solar installation, the city says.

The money for the project comes from future energy savings, in the form of an energy savings performance contract (ESPC) with Siemens. It will be the city’s first-ever renewable energy project. The 15-year ESPC with Siemens will see a 1.8 MW-solar power system built on a six acre site adjacent to the city’s wastewater treatment facility. The city expects to save more than $410,000 in energy costs by reducing energy usage by 2.8 million kWh the first year. Over the life of the contract, total energy savings is expected to be more than $8.6 million.

Wasco uses about 4.7 million kWh, and spends about $713,000, annually on water/wastewater treatment and distribution – accounting for about 30{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} to 40{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} of total energy consumed by the municipality.

The project will not only reduce energy and operating  costs, but will also help the city make better use of existing infrastructure, according to Siemens.

Wasco will also take advantage of a Pactific Gas & Electric program called Renewable Energy Self-generation Bill Credit Transfer (RES-BCT), which allows cities to build up to 5 MW of renewable generation on one site, and provides a credit for excess solar energy that is produced.

“We’re tapping into a program that will offset our energy costs for water pumping and treatment, and we’re able to make creative use of a site that would otherwise be left vacant. We’re looking forward to the years ahead,” says Wasco Mayor Gilberto Reyna.

An ESPC is a contracting tool that uses private-sector financing to implement comprehensive energy savings projects without relying on federal appropriations, and allows for energy improvements with little or no capital outlay on the part of the client. For example, The AUSP Thomson prison in Illinois will benefit from more than $33 million in energy and water savings thanks to an energy savings performance contract (ESPC) signed last year with Ameresco; the project is expected to reduce energy consumption by 53{0b7da518931e2dc7f5435818fa9adcc81ac764ac1dff918ce2cdfc05099e9974} across 13 main buildings, leading to significant reductions in utility and operational costs.

Similarly, the Putnam Valley Central School District in New York signed an energy performance contract with Con Edison Solutions last year, for a project that will improve the energy efficiency of the district’s buildings and infrastructure, improve occupancy comfort, and slow the pace of escalating energy costs– with guaranteed savings of $380,000 annually.

 

Getting It Done: Vendors Mentioned Above

Siemens

Ameresco

Con Edison Solutions

[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

The Maryland Energy Administration appreciates the recent article, “Maryland launches community solar program, creating new green energy opportunities — but also potential conflicts” (Aug. 7), and for recognizing the state’s Community Solar pilot program implemented by the Maryland Public Service Commission with support from multiple stakeholders including MEA.

In support of the pilot program, MEA has developed several incentives which serve commercial, residential and the low-to-moderate income markets. In fiscal year 2018, over $3 million dollars in grant funding was awarded, and an additional $1 million has been allocated for the fiscal year 2019 program incentives to support the larger pilot program. Gov. Larry Hogan supports programs that make more reliable, affordable and clean power available to struggling citizens while assisting businesses that provide jobs.

These pilot program incentives enable more Marylanders with the opportunity to purchase solar energy by easing the initial costs to go solar. While some Maryland residents may be interested in pursuing solar, their residence may not be a good candidate for onsite solar due to the ownership of the property, roof shading or roof orientation. The community solar programs eliminate the need for onsite solar and offer alternative, clean energy options to renters, not just homeowners. This program is made possible via key business partnerships. We believe, if successful, this can be an important next step for Maryland’s clean, sustainable energy generation.

More information can be found at www.Energy.Maryland.gov or call 410-537-4000.

Mary Beth Tung, Baltimore

The writer is director of the Maryland Energy Administration.

Send letters to the editor to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

Richmond Times-Dispatch:

A massive solar farm proposed in western Spotsylvania County has cleared one hurdle, but it has a few others remaining.

In a filing Wednesday, the State Corporation Commission signed off on Utah-based Sustainable Power Group’s Pleinmont Solar LLC proposal to build an outdoor facility with 1.8 million solar panels.

Microsoft Corp. plans to buy a significant amount of the energy produced from the planned solar power project, which is expected to be the largest solar farm in Virginia and one of the largest on the East Coast.

In giving its conditional approval, the commissioners stated that the company bears the risk and must abide by regulations, which include paying for system upgrades to avoid potential impacts to rate-payers and adhering to environmental oversight.

Sustainable Power Group, also known as sPower, hopes to have the first phase of the solar-generating plant running by next June, according to documents filed with the state. But the proposal first has to meet several requirements.

The 500-megawatt solar facility would be built in phases, eventually taking up a total of about 3,500 acres on the 6,000-plus-acre site.

More: Largest solar farm in Virginia clears important hurdle

 

[ad_2]

Source link

[ad_1]

Phony numbers behind California’s solar mandate?

California Republican Party Chairman Jim Brulte on reports a consultant hired by California energy regulators lowballed the costs and benefits of solar panels in homes and the California wildfires.

California Republican Party Chairman Jim Brulte said on Monday the state’s mandate requiring new homes to be equipped with solar panels is an absolute con job that will cost – not save – homeowners money.

“If it will save money then homeowners would do it on the natural,” Brulte told FOX Business’ Ashley Webster on “Varney & Co.” “In my area, about 40 percent of the homeowners actually do buy rooftop solar, but it will cost money – government never gets it right on the cost.”

California was the first state in the U.S. to require new homes to be built with solar panels, but regulators may have misrepresented details to validate the economic benefits to consumers, according to an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal. According to the story, energy regulators hired a consultant that low-balled the costs and estimated benefits of solar panels in homes.

More from FOX Business… 

The proposal is set to go into effect in 2020 and applies to any homes or building up to three stories, but excludes homes in shade and those unable to be fitted for installation.

Brulte added that industrial-scale solar is much less expensive than rooftop solar.

[ad_2]

Source link